![]() I was super excited to get the email late last night about the update but then bummed that it still won't run on my AMD machine. There is now the latest update Beta 2 available that addresses many of the questions and issues raised so far I hope things get figured out - this gives me pause about AMD, whom I root for! (hoping their upcoming GPUs and CPUs kick butt, which they seem to do). People Tunnel by Jacob Carroll, on Flickr. ![]() People Tunnel by Jacob Carroll, on Flickr Ok I lied, here is a quick shot I snapped the other night then used Iridient and Nik to process within LR. I paid the $30 for it so I could use my tiny laptop just to convert the RAF files into DNG for me. If only I could get Iridient to run on my main AMD desktop. No samples to show at the moment but really happy with the results. With the introduction of a 10-24 to my tool bag it is like a whole new world. In the last few weeks I have really been incorporating Iridiend Transformer as well as a few things from Nik here and there. I actually increased Lightroom sharpening to what I felt was its limit (45, 0.5, 29) before the 'worms' started becoming pretty obvious, in order to try to get to Xformer's level of detail. So, while some corner awesomeness may be attributable to Xformer's corrections, I think some of it is also because it just translates Fuji better :-)īelow is bottom-left corner comparison, both images have the same edits except for obviously sharpening. I then re-ran Xformer and used More Detailed, Medium sharpening on the image (disabling all lens corrections and noise reduction) and the corners are still better than Lightroom. Interestingly, XFormer will apply a 'lens correction' to the image even when it's with an adapted lens, whereas Lightroom did not. So I did a quick test using an XT2 and adapted Pentax 50mm f/1.4 Therefore, I suspect that you won't see any correction by IXT with adapted lenses. Regarding your question, I believe that IXT is showing better corners in some cases because it's using the correction information embedded in the RAF for Fuji lenses better than Lightroom is. I'm starting to love this cheap lens even moreĭNG (L) vs RAF (R), Iridient at default settingsīrian (the developer) is quick to answer if you shoot him a note. Tested the X-T2 and XC 16-50 lens in the mountains today. Of course if you sync the folder in Lr CC, it will bring 2 DNG files rather than 1. I don't see this if I import directly? Interesting. If you create the dng via the Edit In option it doesn't leave the extra dng file behind. Sure would like to use my MC 50/1.4 PG and MD 135/2.8 4/4 more. If I can get a touch better sharpness in the corners, it might be more usable. I need to see how my Minolta MD lenses behave on my MB Speedbooster. ![]() I wonder if the corner softness is intrinsic to the conversion process. I won't ever use it for portraiture, but for whenever I get back up and around and can shoot landscapes, I will definitely use the Iridient to DNG conversion. When I then Import the dng files into LR it picks up the mangled filenames because alphabetically they are first in sequence and hides the properly named files as suspected duplicates.Īnyone else see this or am I doing something wrong? I have my file naming set to just Original Name and I end up with a dng file of the original name but I'm also getting another copy of the dng file with a sequence or batch name mangle of the original sitting in the same folder. When I run XTransformer directly using the Select Images to Convert button to select files to convert it then runs the conversion but outputs 2 dng files of exactly the same size. I think I found an issue if you run the XTransformer directly. TIFF is actually DNG data and LR deals w/ that correctly too. TIFF is in the catalog and does all it needs to do but the data *inside* the. Iridient Developer in now available for Windows !!!ĭue to that piece of trickery, LR still thinks the.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |